There's
no such thing as a contradiction, so good on Labour for taking a stand against
the GCSB Bill, the state has no moral mandate for such surveillance about to be
passed into law, but at the same time, what are they, and the Green Party,
thinking when their every policy grows the tax surveillance state, and thus the
powers of the most ruthless, powerful arm of government against which you have
no right to be left alone, though you harm nobody?
Below are simply some of
my (almost randomly copied) tweets, and tweet exchanges, during last nights ‘stop
the GCSB Bill meeting’, present:
Sir Edmund Thomas (chair);
Dame
Anne Salmond
Dr
Rodney Harrison QC
Kim
Dotcom
Thomas
Beagle
Note the
embedded tweets that I’m often responding to are the important ones, mainly
from Labour MP Clare Curran, whom I like, a lot, but these contradictions do my
head in:
I'll
repeat that last one: how have my civil liberties somehow changed as between
stopping government spooks listening to me talk to my mum, electronically, (Labour
are against this), or stopping bureaucrats coming right into my home, into my
bank accounts, my business, taking my income (Labour promote this) … what’s the
difference please?
More
precisely, to the Labour MP’s voting against this GCSB Bill, and good on them, what
is the difference in my feeling of trepidation and rightful moral indignation
about having everything I do snooped on by GCSB, or, by IRD? We have become a country where I can’t express
my opinion on public media, disclaimered up to hell (see bottom of page please)
- I’m no martyr - without the government department I am voicing my concerns
over, actively seeking out and reading my posts: how would you feel in my place?
Despite in this earlier post I was writing on how IRS were planning to
analyse social media, that being the first post I saw IRD enter this blog,
I can only assume ‘our own side’ are scouring social media already, and the
only reason for that can be looking for thought-crimes. So, yeah, I am worried.
I pay my taxes, but there is nothing more invasive that can happen to you than
an income tax audit, right from that first two or three hour interview in Room
101, which you have no legal right not to attend, and no legal redress against.
And after the ‘interview’, called interrogations in some countries, a complete
stranger then spends weeks, months, reading through every aspect of your life.
If you work for a salary or wage, you won’t have thought about that, but the
man or woman taking the risk to run the business that employs you, could be
called up any day, randomly: a strange thanks to get for providing you a job, and every public
service that you use.
The
Fortress of Legislation has become an evil place; but most Kiwis aren’t
equipped philosophically, anymore, to feel the water starting to bubble around
them. And it’s too late to turn the hob off. This GCSB Bill, really, is nothing
compared to the surveillance state we already live in: read my blog.
In
closing, I'm a capitalist, and thus hate crony capitalism which is to
capitalism what sea horses are to horses: to the New Zealand company, Wynyard,
about to list its shares publicly, the main business of which is selling
software to security agencies world-wide to help them analyse big data - and I can guarantee IRS is one of
their many ‘secret’ customers - never have I wanted a company to fail so much. But of
course you won’t: you’ve entered one of the fastest growing industries there is
now: the Orwellian state. The Free West has absolutely no meaning as of 2013,
and it ceased to have meaning quite some time ago. There’s nothing civilised
about the power of state anymore.
Now if
you need something else to read, try my earlier post this month, how via
retrospective legislation and application, IRD can now re-write your personal
history. Not a dicky bird from Labour on that one either. After that, please excuse me, I’ve
got work to do, some large tax bills to pay.
Income tax is theft/protection money, no question about it, but it's hard to argue against it while still using government issued money as your primary means of survival.
ReplyDeleteUsing Gold, Silver, Barter and Bitcoin are free persons money, not government fiat currency.
Just my take on income tax.
Bitcoin certainly interests me. Though even that being brought into the net: FBI citing a blackmail case where Bitcoins were involved, which must lead to some interesting outcomes.
DeleteYou should setup a Bitcoin wallet if you haven't already and publish a donation address, https://blockchain.info/wallet/ provides a fairly secure solution where you don't need to download any software.
DeleteCheck out this video about some of Bitcoins potential that hasn't been enabled yet, but is built into the protocol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD4L7xDNCmA
cheers for that stateless. I've been interested in Bitcoin for a while now, but am a complete dunderhead when it comes to the technology involved. I'll have a look at the clip over the weekend.
Delete