This
last year for me has seen one tiny step forward for the humane treatment of
animals, being a local abused dog re-housed, at the cost of my neighbourly relations.
But now sixty one steps backwards, being my supposed representatives – sick joke that is - in Parliament who will this
year vote for animal testing, in principle and in practice, so children can take recreational drugs, get wasted, and throw
their futures away, after the Green amendment to stop the animal testing aspect
of Peter Dunne’s Psychoactive Substances Bill was struck down yesterday.
Last
night I tweeted the following to every single one of these sixty one MP’s with a Twitter
account:
Going
round MP's (name of MP). Email (bio) how u justify torturing animals 4
recreational drug use please? Answers 4 my blog.
To
date only one reply, which I shall post shortly. It’ll make your blood boil.
I
also sent to the new Minister of Animal Torture For No Good Reason the
following email:
Subject: Animal testing for human recreation.
From: Mark Hubbard
To: "todd.mcclay@national.org.nz"
|
Mr McClay
Toxicity testing is one of the most painful tests
an animal can suffer. Can you please email me, in your own words, how you
justify, for yourself (and your children if you have them), torturing animals
so humans can trash themselves on synthetic recreational drugs?
Please include in your explanation why you are
prepared to torture animals when non-toxic cannabis, if decriminalised, would
meet your ends - either via synthetic or real cannabis, a kid gets stoned - but without a single animal being harmed.
Our's is a representative democracy: if you condone
animal testing for mere human recreation, as you are with the Psychoactive
Substances Bill, now that the excellent Greens amendment has been lost, and
when an alternative exists in the plant, cannabis, then you are unfit to
represent me, certainly, or a humane society. Indeed, you are simply unfit to
represent, period.
Note I am not of the political Left, and certainly
do not vote Greens.
I will be publishing your reply to my blog.
Yours in disgust
Mark Hubbard
I
urge everyone who is appalled by what is about to happen with this Bill to
email and Tweet every National Party MP, plus Peter Dunne, and Brendan Horan –
it only took me one evening. But keep it civil, remember the GCSB, NSA, SIS,
NASA, are all reading this: do the Ghandi thing: no threats, make your points
in a way they have to respond, put pen to paper and for once actually think
about the implications of what they are doing. Please feel free to simply copy and paste my email.
I
shall publish all responses from the MP’s as or if they come to hand. And one
more important point on the contradictory place this started from:
This
is Daisy Dog watching dumbfounded at sixty one humans voting to torture her by
injecting toxins into her body and watching her die over an extended period
under the most painful of procedures in animal testing. And in this case, for no good, justifiable reason. She also said, nonplussed, how could the
monster, Peter Dunne, who instigated this barbarity, support her torture, while
taking a principled stand against heli-hunting of deer? She would rather be
shot and killed outright, she told me, if humans had to get their jollies this
way, than be in pain for months before she died. I tried to comfort her disquiet
by telling her when Mr Dunne was formulating this insanity, he was on the verge
of what was to become a fully-blown mid-life crisis, and I can only think he
wasn’t thinking straight. Subsequent events have proven this to be true.
Update 1:
Animals and Rights.
For
all the emails I’m getting, yes, I know animals don’t have rights. (Just as children have no rights - that's why they have parents to exercise judgement on their behalf). But regarding animals, this
simply makes it all the more important that humans assume their responsibility to
treat them humanely. The animal testing under the Psychoactive Substances Bill
is utterly unnecessary, barbaric, and condemns as unfit to be making decisions
regarding my person, any MP who would vote for it.
For once, I felt proud of John Banks.
ReplyDeleteI pasted this link to the rescued Beagle group.
Cheers Lindsay. (And yes, re John Banks).
DeleteGreat site Mark! John Banks is on Newstalk ZB talkback at the moment - that man rocks! Winston sucks by abstaining! Sharing your site. Elly Maynard, Sirius Global Animal Organisation, NHO in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.
DeleteCheers Elly :)
DeleteThank you Mark, my pound pup thanks you for all his mates, Winston abstained, shame on him!!!!!
DeleteThanks Dawn. Most important, get as many people as you can writing to McClay and the other MP's.
DeleteMark, thanks for speaking out against this legislation.
ReplyDeleteVote AGAINST the Psychoactive Substances Bill
So Cannabis can never be approved under this legislation, such a shame.
ReplyDelete(3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), psychoactive substance
does not include—
(a) a controlled drug specified or described in Schedule 1,
2, or 3 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975:
and of course Alcohol and Tabacco are exempt.
(g) any alcohol, unless the alcohol contains a psychoactive
substance as defined in subsection (1) or (2) that is
not alcohol:
(h) any tobacco product (within the meaning of section 2(1)
of the Smoke-free Environments Act 1990), unless the
tobacco product contains a psychoactive substance as
defined in subsection (1) or (2) that is not tobacco:
Thanks for that stateless. The state's treatment of cannabis and our rights to smoke same, is offensive police state nonsense at the best of times: but this is bringing that into a reason for needless animal cruelty, on a logical absurdity. That makes every MP voting for animal testing, when it is not necessary, a cruel swine.
DeleteAgreed, we already know this stuff isn't good for humans, why do we need to test it on animals.
DeleteAre we really going to live in a world where some new chemical poison is legal under this legislation, but at the same time cannabis will remain illegal? Likely I would guess, it's insane.
(Typing this quickly: apologies for inevitable typos).
DeleteWhat really gets me is the prejudiced logical absurdity.
They're still going to allow psychoactive drugs: ie, that affect the mind and give a high. So there is no difference in the allowed 'effect' between the synthetics and the plant cannabis, but they're going to have to animal test for the toxicity of the synthetic poison, because they are man-made poison, when we all know cannabis, the plant, is not toxic, indeed, has many recogised medicinal properties. Or in another way, cannabis has been tested by humans for over 6,000 years, first recorded use, 2727 BC, not a single recorded death. The average size human would have to smoke 800 joints in a chain to risk dying, and that would not be from the THC, but simple carbon monoxide poisoning.
It's a no-brainer, the whole issue, but none of these conservative MP's have a brain: at least that has to be the assumption. So they're cruel bastards, to the last one.
> So Cannabis can never be approved under this legislation
ReplyDeleteNot as it stands. But all it will take to legalise cannabis is to pass an amendment to repeal Section 3(a). I'm sure someone's already thought of that. :-)
yorkies puppy for sale
ReplyDeleteyorkies puppy for sale
Yorkies are prized toy dogs due to their regal appearance and sassy attitude.
Yorkie puppies love bonding with their humans through consistent and loving affection
yorkies puppy for sale
yorkies puppy for sale
.adorableyorkiepup