Blog description.

Accentuating the Liberal in Classical Liberal: Advocating Ascendency of the Individual & a Politick & Literature to Fight the Rise & Rise of the Tax Surveillance State. 'Illigitum non carborundum'.

Liberty and freedom are two proud words that have been executed from the political lexicon: they were frog marched and stood before a wall of blank minds, then forcibly blindfolded, and shot, with the whimpering staccato of ‘equality’ and ‘fairness’ resounding over and over. And not only did this atrocity go unreported by journalists in the mainstream media, they were in the firing squad.

The premise of this blog is simple: the Soviets thought they had equality, and welfare from cradle to grave, until the illusory free lunch of redistribution took its inevitable course, and cost them everything they had. First to go was their privacy, after that their freedom, then on being ground down to an equality of poverty only, for many of them their lives as they tried to escape a life behind the Iron Curtain. In the state-enforced common good, was found only slavery to the prison of each other's mind; instead of the caring state, they had imposed the surveillance state to keep them in line. So why are we accumulating a national debt to build the slave state again in the West? Where is the contrarian, uncomfortable literature to put the state experiment finally to rest?

Comments Policy: I'm not moderating comments, so keep it sane and go away with the spam. Government officials please read disclaimer at bottom of page.

Thursday, July 11, 2013

My Challenge to Every MP About to Vote for the Psychoactive Substances Bill.

Every reader who agrees with the below, send this link to the MP’s email addresses as listed by Richard Goode on this link. Including the Greens whom I can’t believe are voting for this. Send as many times as you like, to as many as you can. Be civil. Have no malice. But be a nuisance, don’t let them away with what they are about to do.

My challenge:

MP’s, before you vote for this Bill, you must do the following, indeed, the House must do the following: none of you has a right to vote yes to animal testing via this Bill, until you experience the suffering you are cruelly about to legislate.

First: remember the ludicrous goal you are trying to achieve. There will be nothing noble behind this animal testing – you are going to demand animals undergo the most painful test of all, toxicity testing, not for medical science, not to save human lives, but so your children, nephews, nieces, grandchildren, can get high, (for Christ’s sake). So they can get a cheap thrill, no different to binge drinking on a Friday night.

Now, onto that table in the debating chamber of the Fortress of Legislation, put 100 cages. Into each cage put a beagle. Despite this beagle will trust you implicitly, look at you with their sad little eyes as they are carried by a white suited scientist/torturer to their cage; despite they will cry out for affection from you, for a kind word, for  a stroke; despite all this, there must be no emotion shown them. They will be placed in their stark cages, no cushions, no kind words, no human contact, no contact with each other, no form of emotional comfort whatsoever, then while you are sitting over the next two, three and four weeks, have the white coated monsters regularly administer a toxin to them. Close your eyes, imagine those hundred little dogs in their cages, looking at you, dumbfounded, confused, in pain. Now watch them cry in their pain as they are bound to their cages so they can't move; remember there will be no respite from their pain, in those little prison cell cages. When the pitiful cries become too much for you to bear, tape their little mouths closed, but keep watching until half of them mercifully give up their will to live, and die, the remainder pain racked zombies.

Now, who’s still left voting for this Bill? Those of you who are, I suggest, need to be taken away from decent, humane people, because you are monsters: the fact you are making rules I have to live by, and taxing me for that, a crime.

But if you are not prepared to meet this challenge, then not one of you, including you hypocritical bloody Greens, is entitled to vote this Bill through.

I dare you.

Surely you're all better than this?

Related Posts:

Why  is the Psychoactive Substances Bill Not Subject to a Conscience Vote

Update 1:

Those cruel bastards just went and passed this. I'm stunned how many voted for it. Not one of them deserves to come back in 2014. Black day: two thoughts to end with:

One thing has changed: my nightmare scenario above regarding animal testing will now occur.

1 comment:

  1. Mark, I know what you mean, but it's not appropriate to call them "cruel swine". (You've done it twice now.) Seriously. Pigs are better than that.