Many
would think my libertarianism doesn’t sit well with my animal welfare posts: I
couldn’t care less. Animal welfare comes first, albeit I could say the
minarchist, voluntary society will only exist where humans have inculcated a
humane treatment of animals … join the dots as you wish, I've written enough in
here for you to do so.
If you search this blog for PSA (Psychoactive
Substances Act), or look at some of the animal welfare links on my right-hand
menu, you’ll see I’ve written post after post against the 119 members of the Fortress of Legislation who voted for this Act and its barbaric
principle that it is acceptable to cruelly test animals so that teenagers can
get stoned Friday night on toxic, synthetic cannabinoids (when simply
legalising cannabis, which I support, would have achieved the same results
safely - cannabis isn’t toxic - and without a single animal being harmed.) It
was heartening that for once, when the PSA was still in bill form, Kiwis rose
up and took to the streets in protest against its animal testing component, the
result of which we were told by Minister McClay there would be a special
commission of experts set up to ensure no animal would be tested under this
ludicrous legislation. At least that's what we thought we'd been told, so the
protest stopped.
From
the below Twitter exchange, just this last Friday, with Green member Mojo
Mathers -and despite her party’s luddite
economics of the slave state, I like Mojo for the work she is doing for
animals, and despite still being one of the 119 infamous bastards voting for this
pointless Act, (never trust politicians) - I am one hundred percent convinced
there will indeed be animals tortured, before they are killed, for what amounts
only to our human recreation, smoking this dreadful, synthetic crud legal under
the Act, while harmless cannabis remains criminalised.
Note
two things from Mojo’s posts:
Firstly,
I read her replies to mean there will definitely be animal toxicity
testing:
…
we just don’t know if this will include reproductive testing. Perhaps Mojo can
dissuade me of that one if false.
Secondly,
reproductive testing is also definitely on the table. If you don’t know what
that is, it’s this:
Reproductive
toxicity includes the toxic effects of a substance on the reproductive ability
of an organism and the development of its offspring … Animal tests include
evaluating the effects of prenatal exposure on pregnant animals and their
offspring [OECD Test Guideline (TG) 414]. … The
test substance is administered orally, the pregnant animals are killed just
prior to delivery, and the fetuses are examined for toxic effects. … [In] Reproductive/Developmental
Toxicity Screening Assay) … the test substance [is] administered orally for
4-9 weeks. Pathological effects are determined by daily observation,
necropsy, and microscopic histopathology. … Offspring are evaluated for
neurotoxic effects including "gross neurologic and behavioural
abnormalities, and the evaluation of brain weights and neuropathology during
postnatal development and adulthood."
As
for the instigator of this obscene Act, which I don’t see as having achieved
anything of value, the conflicted and contradictory PeterDunne, he does not deserve to be given his seat again this election.
I
know there are more than two readers who follow my animal welfare posts: please
link this and spread the word. And when you get a moment perhaps it might be a
good idea to drop Minister McClay, aka, Minister Invisible, a line letting him
know nothing has changed for the many opponents of this Act, and that we are
still here watching: start your email or letter with any form of animal testing for human recreation is unacceptable,
especially legislation legalising a toxic synthetic slugde, when a harmless cannabis
is kept criminalised. Finally, in a properly functioning democracy, the results of the Advisory Committee would be known by this year's election, so Kiwis can hold the minister responsible in the voting booth for any animal testing under the PSA. Politicians need to understand the PSA will be as toxic to them, as it's going to be to those animals put to torture, then death, by it.
No comments:
Post a Comment