Spot
what is wrong from the first two sentences of this Stuff piece:
A Christchurch couple and five of their six children are living in a relative's sleepout as they struggle to find a place to live.
Anne Bovey and her partner AJ McIlroysay say landlords reject them because they are both on a benefit and have a poor credit rating.
Six
children on two benefits.
That
story is ostensibly about the earthquakes and the housing crisis.
That
story has nothing to do with earthquakes and the housing crisis.
That
story is about monumental irresponsibility, and this Gulag of Welfarism in which
an Arrogance of Altruists in the Fortress of Legislation forces me to pay for
it. Watch the kids repeat mom and dad.
Too
angry to write more. But if you have a 100% secured fortune, have a big family; personally, I think you're nuts, but fine:
if not, just have a responsible sized family, and further, having children is
not compulsory.
When
Jacinda starts rabbiting (excuse the extended pun) on about tax evaders, show her
to this thread, because why would responsible people want to encourage the callousness of this; really, what chance do these children have? This
is the argument that tax mitigation and even evasion is the responsible, moral
path – though of course I’m not recommending it, as we live in the Surveillance Police-State, this post will be assessed by the hive mind, and those
found wanting (not to ‘give’ enough at the gun of government) will be destroyed by the bureaucrats - for the hive minders', please read my disclaimer at the bottom of this blog. It’s
a world where morality has been turned upside down, and society in chasing the common good, is eating itself … yet again.
Don't worry about taxpayers trying to stop this nonsense, Jacinda, and protect their property. Don't worry about benefit abuse, as you say, in the scheme of things it's nothing; worry about benefit use - there's the problem, and your every policy will grow that use, and suck innocent, hard-working, risk-taking taxpayers dry to pay for it, while stripping them of their privacy, and right to be left alone. It's not good enough. This tax slave demands to be free of you, but, of course, that's the last thing you can allow on your election bribes, isn't it.
Don't worry about taxpayers trying to stop this nonsense, Jacinda, and protect their property. Don't worry about benefit abuse, as you say, in the scheme of things it's nothing; worry about benefit use - there's the problem, and your every policy will grow that use, and suck innocent, hard-working, risk-taking taxpayers dry to pay for it, while stripping them of their privacy, and right to be left alone. It's not good enough. This tax slave demands to be free of you, but, of course, that's the last thing you can allow on your election bribes, isn't it.
(And where is the reporting of the why? Why have you both had six children on not a low income, on no income? No, actually, on my income.)
No comments:
Post a Comment