Chester
Borrows brought in new measures yesterday to battle benefit fraud in New
Zealand, including the ability to prosecute partners (in crime) of welfare
fraudsters. However, the day became most marked by how Labour tried
so hard to make us all look the other way. The chief diversionary tactic was
exemplified by MP Jacinda Ardern, confusing two completely separate topics, asking
why Borrows wasn’t so ruthless over hunting down and shooting tax evaders.
Twitter was alight with how Chester Borrows was beneficiary bashing, why wasn’t
he going for tax evaders, why wasn’t he going for bankers, one tweeter wanted
to know why he wasn’t taking down the HSBC.
Let
me dispel some of the confusion for the Emptiness (new collective noun) of
Airheads that’s is becoming the chief voting block in New Zealand:
Q: Why did Borrows bring in new
measures to bash beneficiaries with, not tax evaders and banker wankers?
A:
Because he’s Associate Minister of Social Development. It is Minister Dunne who
would bring in measures against tax evaders, etc and so forth. (This stuff is
not hard). It would be no more likely or appropriate he brought in measures
against these other groups, than introduce health reforms.
Q: Why is Borrows bashing
beneficiaries?
A:
He’s not. He’s merely attacking benefit fraudsters. If laws attacking benefit
fraud are beneficiary bashing, then laws attacking shop lifting are shopper bashing. To
make this mistake, the Emptiness must believe that all beneficiaries are
fraudsters?
But
my main gripe is with Jacinda who in her heart of hearts – because she doesn’t
use her head at all – plainly believes that every businessman owes beneficiaries
their living, and every businessman is a tax evader.
First,
beneficiaries and tax evaders aren’t even comparable, Jacinda: it’s like
comparing thieves to apples. Beneficiaries who are playing the system are
living off the effort of others, and are happy to see honest taxpayers have
their property, including earnings, and privacy stripped from them by force so
they can live parasitically. Tax mitigators are free men and
women living by their own means, trying to protect what is theirs – their property
– from out of control politicians who have no morality at all.
You
know, in ending, around the time of the American Revolution, the only revolution that has
had lasting good, tax evaders were called heroes and the champions of liberty.
The Jacinda’s of this world champion only Soviet styled slavery. And as for her
ludicrous statement that New Zealand’s Secret Police force, IRD, aren’t going
after tax evaders, I can only assume Jacinda is clueless as to what shock and
awe powers her Arrogance of Altruists in Wellingrad have given them: and on
this she has no excuse, because I spelled those powers out directly to her last
October, and the proof of how they are used to destroy honest taxpayers, from half way down this post.
I suspect Jacinda & co's cognitive biases would prevent them even considering this straightforward truth. Good on ya for putting it out there for the people who still think though.
ReplyDeleteCheers. And less and less left.
Delete