Here,
in a short Herald piece by Alanah Eriksen, we see first-hand the unthinking statist
immorality that has built the new surveillance states of the West, after the
old ones of the early and mid-twentieth century were beaten by the Allies at
huge cost. The same statist immorality promulgated by the Fortresses of
Legislation that have built the welfare states which destroyed self-reliance
and self-responsibility, dooming citizens to debt and tax slavery, and
tragically, on the back of the economic and social destruction of the West’s
fiat money systems and Keynesian socialism, seen fascism marching in Europe again, which has returned to the scary days of the 1930’s, courtesy of
the Left’s Gulags of Forced Altruism.
I
need do little more than highlight the central contradiction in Alanah’s (sob)
story. She starts out correctly reporting fact:
Tax-dodging
New Zealanders cheated the country out of at least $80 million in undeclared
income last year … The Inland Revenue Department has revealed to the Herald that it received about 177
tip-offs a week from disgruntled Kiwis about earnings being concealed.
Albeit
noting a society structured in such a way that citizens dob each other in for
punishment, is the embodiment of the fascist state, where ultimately the bonds
of natural love and affection are broken as children are urged to dob their parents in, that’s not the point I’m wanting to make, which is rather how
Alanah leaves reporting behind from this point, and simply emotes over her
keyboard, as I’ve written on before:
That's enough to feed more than
375,000 families of four based on the average amount spent on food in Auckland.
It could have funded more than 8000 breast cancer surgeries, 1650 open heart
surgeries, the redevelopment of children's hospital Starship twice over, or
rebuild the earthquake-ravaged Christchurch Cathedral.
Dreadful,
isn’t it, how can we argue with that? I could, in fact, just on the principle,
for a start by asking whose money this is we’re talking about that Alanah would
have spent on building a pointless steeple. And if 375,000 families need to be fed, then I
put it to you in the twenty first century the Welfare state created
that need, against which, mind, I may voluntarily choose to help feed a family that can’t feed
itself, probably by helping them from my vege garden – no doubt wondering all
the time, why they haven’t got one – but no state ever should force such ‘compassion’
from me, because that results in something much worse: the slave state and its
creeping cruelty, building, building, building itself ever bigger by beating then eating the hands
forced to feed it, all to grow the number of families that aren't self-reliant anymore. And why did you not think, Alanah, of the possibility
of individuals simply insuring themselves against breast cancer and open heart
surgeries, which they could afford to if the state didn’t strip them of the
resources to do so, while leaving all of us free to pursue our happiness
unmanacled to bureaucrats? You’ve just assumed a public health system is a given
that must be paid for, even by those of us who want no bar of it, because we have
learned, like the Soviets who felt they had free healthcare, that free
healthcare always ends up costing a society everything. Though well done for literally
bringing in affairs of the open heart in your shining example of how by not
thinking, the MSM is feeling and slouching our way to the new police states. As stated, I can argue all this on principle,
but I don’t need to do so, for in her own article, IRD provide the contradiction
at the heart of Alanah’s darkness:
"Often
people are in pretty dire straits when they start evading tax by not paying
PAYE and GST, they're often up against the wall financially already," said
the IRD's group tax counsel, Graham Tubb.
"So
you can understand that we might have difficulty recovering the money." He
said there were cases of tax evasion that the department may never find out
about.
How
edifying. No surprises we’re going through hard times at the moment, so what we
are really talking about here is many businesses, hardworking independent Kiwis,
on the breadline, that aren’t able to pay their tax, without taking food from
their own tables, or paying the insurance for the heart operations on
themselves and their loved ones. That’s how the welfare state has punched an
iron fist through the heart of self-reliance, with this reporter cheering
ghoulishly from the side-lines. At the very least, this ‘fact’ reported by
Alanah shows New Zealand needs a tax-free income threshold, of $35,000 to $40,000, that allows a
family a living, and independence, before they have to start coughing up the tax to
support the lives of total strangers and their life decisions, many of them
monumentally mental.
And
finally, that steeple, Alanah; are you seriously telling me building a slave
state to extract tax from these struggling individuals just trying to survive
and feed their families, is justified by their meal and insurance money being
used to build the Anglican Church a new Cathedral in Christchurch in order the
five church-goers there can praise some Monty Python character on Sunday? If he
did exist, and if he’d walked around the Eastern suburbs post quakes, I reckon
you’ll find Jesus - and most likely Brian - would be appalled with you turning
morality on its head to this extent. Dreadful; the slippery, under-handed,
hypocritical Left. This is not reporting you’re doing here, its sheer
propaganda. And the editor of the Herald who let that paragraph past should be
ashamed of him or herself: does professionalism not exist in our fourth estate
anymore? This piece was pure op-ed, not for the news pages, and by publishing
as such, Granny Herald becomes just another statist blog, pushing the line of
the tyranny of the common good.
Please,
for the sake of the free, decent society, next time you get the urge to emote
an article, Alanah, trying thinking first.
Disclaimer:
Per my by-line, if you evade your taxes, you’re a bloody idiot. Ironically,
your prudent course of action is to go bankrupt trying to pay your taxes, then
exist on a benefit while watching Sky News reporting the collapse of Europe and
the US. And yeah, I know that’s insane in every respect, but this is social
democracy. I can’t explain it, ask this bloke.
Pay 33k. Not a cent more.
ReplyDeleteI read your Herald Op-ed ... and that 'was' an op-ed :)
DeleteThough I think the real problem here is those taxpayers trying to survive who can't get above the 17.5% tax bracket. We need, at the very least, a tax free income threshold to allow workers and businesspeople to look after themselves before all the redistributing BS. At least we'd be promoting self-reliance rather than fostering dependence.
Wow, the 'op-ed' bit; that is a long memory Mark, impressive.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with a tax free thresh-hold. That is a progressive tax. If the cost of running the state is 33k a year, then everyone should pay $33k. Why should I pay more or less than the person next to me?
I think the Libertarianz are wrong here. Of course, if there was actually a poll tax you would see state services melt faster than a snowman in Somalia, but that of course would be the point.
Great column Mark. And Damien, I agree a tax free threshold is progressive tax, but it's a step in the right direction, i.e. everyone gets a tax break.
ReplyDeleteCheers Richard.
Delete... Do we have a new 'coalition' coming out of the Libz conference?
Discussions are continuing, Mark. I would like to think we will be putting up a credible list of candidates at the local body elections next year.
DeleteDamien Grant: "If the cost of running the state is 33k a year, then everyone should pay $33k. Why should I pay more or less than the person next to me? I think the Libertarianz are wrong here. Of course, if there was actually a poll tax you would see ..."
ReplyDeleteGraham Tubb: "... that we might have difficulty recovering the money."