I
find every form of theocracy dangerous and repugnant, whether it be Christians
handing my life over to their angry God; Moslem’s to that contradiction, Allah;
or socialists to the butchering machine of the twentieth century, the State.
The most evil thing a society can do against itself is hand over its
individuals - their liberty of mind and body - to the caprice of an Other: the
ills in our welfare state, including the need for John Campbell’s Lunchbox
program - which I’ve just donated to - can be traced back to the destruction of
self-reliance and self-responsibility, thus natural love, affection, and compassion,
within our Gulags of Forced Altruism.
It
is on this footing, as a libertarian, I can say that though I respect the right
of every individual to believe whatever they like, so long as they don’t breach
the non-initiation of force or fraud principle, that does not mean I have to
respect what it is they believe in, especially if it is a creed that bases
itself on anything other than the liberty and volition of the individual human
to pursue their happiness.
And
so while I would (figuratively, that is, don’t test it) die for the right of
New Zealand’s Moslem population to purchase this former Catholic school in Dunedin, and to set up a school for their young there,
don’t expect me to like it, and see it as anything but another step back from the
road to freedom that civilised man has as their goal in the only life-time that
exists: this one on Earth. A road I saw as my birth right since signposted in 1776,
but that has been detoured yet again down the road to serfdom of Orwell's Big Brother State.
I
have written before on how the father of modern thought on
multiculturalism, Montesquieu, would be appalled at how modern man has
misinterpreted his writings:
… Montesquieu; particularly in his
1748 ‘The Spirit of Laws’ – (a
line of thought that has been undermined by Left politics, with serious
consequences). Namely, while Montesquieu professed a delight in cultural
diversity, he always held that while all cultures might be equally valuable, they
were not equally good, thus underlying any celebration of cultural
diversity, there was (is) a justice that is eternal. He called it the ‘eternal
flame’.
From
this our Western rule of law must not hold a hand out to Sharia, and I hope
this first South Island Islamic school does not become the breath that might ultimately blow
out the eternal flame of a humanist, classical liberalism; for while I am
willing to delight in the cultural diversity it will bring, the celebration
must not draw a curtain across the fact this faith is not ‘equally good’ to a
humane morality based on man qua man.
Regarding
Islam, I do not respect a faith in which you can work side by side with a man,
who for years behaved like a good bloke, indeed, with a grace that could convert an agnostic to the notion of a moderate Islam, but then two weeks after he
has disappeared from the workplace, find he’s taken his 16 year old daughter,
brought up in New Zealand as a Westerner, to Pakistan and an arranged marriage.
I think that is barbaric, his daughter treated at best as a chattel, at worst,
cattle. And though I have no respect for the Catholics who will form a major
opposition bloc to MP Maryan Street’s Euthanasia Bill should it make it out of
the ballot, I have even less respect for the faith that is replacing it in this
school in Dunedin. Because for all the talk of it being the religion of peace,
you must excuse me, because I’ve yet to come across an atheist (or latter day Catholic)
Taliban, so I’ll be throwing my lot in with the atheists. The world won’t know
the enlightenment of a peaceful, free society, until we can cast off both
schools of superstitious mysticism: as Voltaire wisely said, those that believe
in absurdity, will always be capable of atrocity, and in that I include every
religion.
Praise
be to man. Have a good weekend.
I think the future will force you to choose, whether you like it or not, between Christianity & Islam.
ReplyDeleteAnd after that choice, and again knowing you may not like it, you will be forced to choose between Conservatism and Progressivism.
I think everything else will be peripheral, and there is every chance those two choices could involve bloodshed.
Given Liberty is your driving ambition, I would be interested to see how you could favour Islam and Progressivism from the above options.
I certainly won't ever be choosing between Islam and Christianity: I'm an atheist, individualist, humanist.
DeleteAnd I will remain libertarian, 'above conservatives and progressives :)
That's why I no longer tactically vote in elections.
Yes, but as I said, I think you will forced into making that choice perhaps in a condition of bloodshed and violence, for the four forces I have listed could well turn out to be those apocalyptic riders we have all been warned about.
ReplyDeleteThink not?
I say either America or England will be the sooner test of that.