Blog description.

Accentuating the Liberal in Classical Liberal: Advocating Ascendency of the Individual & a Politick & Literature to Fight the Rise & Rise of the Tax Surveillance State. 'Illigitum non carborundum'.

Liberty and freedom are two proud words that have been executed from the political lexicon: they were frog marched and stood before a wall of blank minds, then forcibly blindfolded, and shot, with the whimpering staccato of ‘equality’ and ‘fairness’ resounding over and over. And not only did this atrocity go unreported by journalists in the mainstream media, they were in the firing squad.

The premise of this blog is simple: the Soviets thought they had equality, and welfare from cradle to grave, until the illusory free lunch of redistribution took its inevitable course, and cost them everything they had. First to go was their privacy, after that their freedom, then on being ground down to an equality of poverty only, for many of them their lives as they tried to escape a life behind the Iron Curtain. In the state-enforced common good, was found only slavery to the prison of each other's mind; instead of the caring state, they had imposed the surveillance state to keep them in line. So why are we accumulating a national debt to build the slave state again in the West? Where is the contrarian, uncomfortable literature to put the state experiment finally to rest?

Comments Policy: I'm not moderating comments, so keep it sane and go away with the spam. Government officials please read disclaimer at bottom of page.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Why This Surveillance State II: National MP, Tau Henare – GCSB.

It is not unimportant I can start this post by copying and pasting my first paragraph yesterday relating to Labour MP, Andrew Little: this strikes at the heart of how representative democracy, after voting us chained and subservient to a theocracy of state - and all in the hope of an illusory free lunch - has delivered us to Orwell’s nightmare.

To repeat myself:

The biggest surprise I’ve had since our politicians unwisely took to social media is how uninformed are our members of parliament who believe they have some type of qualification, and worse, moral mandate, to govern my life. I’m saying ‘govern’ and 'mandate', rather than represent me, because not one MP in Parliament represents me: each three years the vote I make is useless – I simply throw it away in principle on Libertarianz.

Mass surveillance of our metadata will probably make it into law by one vote: this means that Tau’s vote against could stop the GCSB Bill, in the same manner that Peter Dunne’s could. Never forget it is also every member of National that will vote us into the surveillance state. Two questions from the below exchange:

Do you think from the evidence that Tau is making an informed vote on the GCSB Bill? (Reminding you per one of my tweets that three days after voting in the Psychoactive Substances Bill, Tau was telling me no animal would be tested, which we know will be false by the terms of the Act itself).

Given the weight of the reasoned evidence for not passing the GCSB Bill in its current form, from authorities as high as the Law Society, and as urbanely considered as the opposition of Tech Liberty New Zealand and Thomas Beagle’s many wise words; do you think it offensive that the only man in this post with the ability to vote this law down, decries those against it as mere conspiracy theorists?

This kindy of a country. If you think about it Tau, the conspiracy theorists are those that see a terrorist behind every private communication, and so want mass surveillance. I ask you to please read what the ANZAC’s were fighting for, because you are about to dishonour them.

No comments:

Post a Comment