This
last year for me has seen one tiny step forward for the humane treatment of
animals, being a local abused dog re-housed, at the cost of my neighbourly relations.
But now sixty one steps backwards, being my supposed representatives – sick joke that is - in Parliament who will this
year vote for animal testing, in principle and in practice, so children can take recreational drugs, get wasted, and throw
their futures away, after the Green amendment to stop the animal testing aspect
of Peter Dunne’s Psychoactive Substances Bill was struck down yesterday.
Last
night I tweeted the following to every single one of these sixty one MP’s with a Twitter
account:
Going
round MP's (name of MP). Email (bio) how u justify torturing animals 4
recreational drug use please? Answers 4 my blog.
To
date only one reply, which I shall post shortly. It’ll make your blood boil.
I
also sent to the new Minister of Animal Torture For No Good Reason the
following email:
Subject: Animal testing for human recreation.
From: Mark Hubbard
To: "todd.mcclay@national.org.nz"
|
Mr McClay
Toxicity testing is one of the most painful tests
an animal can suffer. Can you please email me, in your own words, how you
justify, for yourself (and your children if you have them), torturing animals
so humans can trash themselves on synthetic recreational drugs?
Please include in your explanation why you are
prepared to torture animals when non-toxic cannabis, if decriminalised, would
meet your ends - either via synthetic or real cannabis, a kid gets stoned - but without a single animal being harmed.
Our's is a representative democracy: if you condone
animal testing for mere human recreation, as you are with the Psychoactive
Substances Bill, now that the excellent Greens amendment has been lost, and
when an alternative exists in the plant, cannabis, then you are unfit to
represent me, certainly, or a humane society. Indeed, you are simply unfit to
represent, period.
Note I am not of the political Left, and certainly
do not vote Greens.
I will be publishing your reply to my blog.
Yours in disgust
Mark Hubbard
I
urge everyone who is appalled by what is about to happen with this Bill to
email and Tweet every National Party MP, plus Peter Dunne, and Brendan Horan –
it only took me one evening. But keep it civil, remember the GCSB, NSA, SIS,
NASA, are all reading this: do the Ghandi thing: no threats, make your points
in a way they have to respond, put pen to paper and for once actually think
about the implications of what they are doing. Please feel free to simply copy and paste my email.
I
shall publish all responses from the MP’s as or if they come to hand. And one
more important point on the contradictory place this started from:

This
is Daisy Dog watching dumbfounded at sixty one humans voting to torture her by
injecting toxins into her body and watching her die over an extended period
under the most painful of procedures in animal testing. And in this case, for no good, justifiable reason. She also said, nonplussed, how could the
monster, Peter Dunne, who instigated this barbarity, support her torture, while
taking a principled stand against heli-hunting of deer? She would rather be
shot and killed outright, she told me, if humans had to get their jollies this
way, than be in pain for months before she died. I tried to comfort her disquiet
by telling her when Mr Dunne was formulating this insanity, he was on the verge
of what was to become a fully-blown mid-life crisis, and I can only think he
wasn’t thinking straight. Subsequent events have proven this to be true.
Update 1:
Animals and Rights.
For
all the emails I’m getting, yes, I know animals don’t have rights. (Just as children have no rights - that's why they have parents to exercise judgement on their behalf). But regarding animals, this
simply makes it all the more important that humans assume their responsibility to
treat them humanely. The animal testing under the Psychoactive Substances Bill
is utterly unnecessary, barbaric, and condemns as unfit to be making decisions
regarding my person, any MP who would vote for it.