Actually,
over time it's always the economics of slavery, but if I use that word in the
title, centre voters turn off, thinking me a writer of extremes which don’t
concern their lives. Warning, there are extremes in this post, but they don’t
come from me: they come from the debt figures produced by centre left and
centre right governments, which hold complete power in New Zealand. The numbers
are in my below comment to a thread on Whaleoil: my comment first, with context
to follow:
I suspect some few of the Whale Army vote National. When National came in 2008 government debt was $10,258 billion. As of September just gone, that debt stands at $60,015 billion.With the Christchurch earthquake costed in this government continues to borrow $27 million per day. That's per day; to fund government operations that make up over 44% of the entire economic activity in the country. And National is the party of small government ... yeah right.Look at this fact from a different perspective. The government is borrowing $27 million a day for a country with only just over 4 million population, which we have to repay, with interest ... how's that going to work out?Worse, a good fact from @RedBaiternz on Twitter, we have only just over 2 million taxpayers having to fund future annual budgets of $70 billion ... how's that going to work out?Let's burrow - not borrow - down deeper. We know that the top 12% of taxpayers fund over 75% of the net tax take. Ignoring for now company, trustee income tax and indirect taxation that means about 250,000 people only are having to fund into the future some large part of $70 billion annual budgets, including debt servicing, so far, on $60 billion and growing.Whale would call reasoned classical liberals such as Libertarianz the 'extreme fringe': no, the extremities are in the above numbers. The only way you fund that debt long term is increasing taxation - I suggest markedly - and forcibly enforcing the continuing destruction of property rights, and personal civil rights, given the first thing the tax surveillance state must do to ensure the tax-take, is take away your privacy, while granting itself access to your property, starting with your income.In fact, the only sane option 2014 is a vote for Libertarianz. Ironic most of the Whale army will be voting for the bigger and bigger nanny state, which is quickly become mathematically impossible, as the US and many countries in Europe are finding.
The
context of this thread is interesting. It was Whale’s analysis of Rodney Hide’s
NBR piece about how Colin Craig, leader of New Zealand’s fledgling Conservative
Party, in an interview given some weeks before where he had stated his party
would forcibly purchase (take) developers’ land from them if they didn’t build
on it within a short time-frame suiting the politicians, thus destroyed the
central premise of Conservatism, namely, sacrosanct property rights.
One
of the first comments to that thread reasonably asked:
Wow i missed him saying that. So there is still no party in New Zealand that believes in Private Property Rights.
I
replied that Libertarianz Party was founded wholly and unalterably on property
rights. Of course Whale responded with his predictable scorn of the pragmatist,
the type of pragmatist voting that has produced the figures in my final comment
above:
Yeah, the libertarians...too pure to achieve anything, the happy hand clappers of nz politics
My
reply to that stands on its own:
That's a meaningless response, Whale. Libertarianz are the only party left representing Western classical liberal values: the free society. If we changed any of the tenets of belief, as you suggest, then we become just another party representing nothing.If people want to vote for a party that wholly respects property rights, there is only the one. I was simply answering a question.
In
next year’s election, that truly is the voter choice: if you believe in
property rights, then Libertarianz is your only option, if not, then vote for
any other party, and help grow, at varying speeds, the mathematical
impossibility of centre opportunistic fiat moneyed politics - read future tax
indentured slavery of your children and grandchildren. And there’s a logical reason for
how such politick destroys us; my most oft used quotation from Daniel Horowitz:
“We must understand that there is an imbalance of power in the political system of any democracy in that the forces of statism have an innate advantage over the defenders of freedom. It takes but one legislative or administrative victory for statism to succeed in guiding society on an indelible path towards dependency. We cannot perpetuate the free-market, but we can perpetuate statism by creating inveterate dependency constituencies. Statism enjoys the inherent advantage of self-perpetuation through its own pernicious activities that engender a continued need for the government programs.”
