…
[This post is not about FATCA, but Minister McClay states the pan-OECD information sharing mechanism of his press release is designed on a FATCA which] wasn't designed only to kill corporates, it’s about capturing the lives of individuals:
it’s sharing information at the level of individual citizens, no matter where
they live in the world, and on every financial asset they hold, including,
therefore, transactions through them. If you’re married to an American, living
in New Zealand, every detail of every transaction you transact through a joint
account with your spouse, is likely being screened by IRD to be reported to IRS, or straight handed over; that’s all your
details, with your names on it, not just some mere anonymous aggregate metadata
which Progressives – surprisingly unsurprisingly invisible in this debate - are
so concerned about: what do you think about that? Because if I were to legislate for myself access to your every
financial transaction, I could describe your life down to its intimate details,
indeed down to what’s happening in the bedroom.
… coercive Western welfare states are destroying our economic
lives, after having first frog marched our private lives at gunpoint into the
digital garrisons of state officials.
Civilisation
is a movement toward privacy, an Orwellian surveillance state the opposite, and
tax legislation, especially tax administration, has become the legislation and administration
of surveillance and authoritarian rule, in contravention of the rule of law,
and common decency. I
If
only this post was satire. I’m taking a short respite from writing my critique
of modern English literature – it’s a big task, after all - to broadcast this
‘breaking news’ – at least that’s how it should have been treated.
On
this day, Wednesday, 29 October, 2014, New Zealand’s Minister of
Revenue-Taking has announced, by way press release, the timetable for the roll
out of a Pan-Western Police Surveillance State. Yet as far as I can (quickly)
see, not one MSM outlet thought it newsworthy to report this formation of the
foundation of mankind’s greatest nemesis, the totalitarian state; this particularly
surprising given the size of the endeavour is not on a national scale, but a
grand one dwarfing the old Soviet Bloc, and - because the Godwin is relevant – while
not covering a land area as big as Hitler dreamed, bigger than what he
achieved, as well as bigger, if I remember rightly, than Orwell’s Oceania in 1984. As I said in my last post,
reciting a philosopher who understood A is A, the difference between welfare
states and totalitarian states is was only time.
Hon Todd McClay
Minister of Revenue
Media statement
29 October 2014
NZ to join global
crackdown on tax evasion
Revenue Minister Todd McClay today announced New Zealand’s timetable for
participation in a global automatic
exchange of information aimed at cracking down on tax evasion.
G20 leaders announced the initiative in September 2013 - and in May 2014, New
Zealand, along with all OECD countries,
joined in the general declaration of support for the move. Australia, holding
the G20 Presidency this year, announced their implementation timetable last
month.
“Multinational companies that use base erosion and profit shifting
(BEPS) measures to avoid tax is a global problem – and we are committing to
joining other OECD countries in finding a global solution.
“New Zealand intends to align its timetable with Australia’s and begin
exchanging information on a voluntary basis from 2018, aiming for mandatory reporting in 2019. This will give New
Zealand’s financial industry enough time to
comply with the initiative”, says Mr McClay
“The automatic exchange of information
initiative will set a global standard for sharing information. It will
operate much like the recently introduced US
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act [FATCA] where financial institutions will
provide information on account holders’ financial assets to their local tax
authority.”
Mr McClay says New Zealand is firmly supportive of this global move to
counter evasion.
“Tax evasion respects no borders so global co-operation is the way to
combat it. Sharing information is a powerful weapon in that fight”.
Forget
the considerable costs of this on the private sector - that is, on you and me -
this central mechanism of the police state, the tax take, so large it is
funding government activities which constitute up to half the spend in Western
economies, here justifies the passing of a ‘global
standard for information sharing’ putatively to be known as the Global Account Tax Compliance Act (GATCA). Noted by Mr McClay was the final brick
in the wall leading to this near-global police surveillance prison, namely, that
extraordinary piece of US imperialism known as the Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act, FATCA; I’ve written previously on why that Act is evil, and
that post has become the sixth most read post on this blog, albeit two thirds
read out of America even though it affects all of us with Minister McClay’s
declaration today - I hope even one person on reading here will choose to become
informed by reading that earlier post: FATCA - The New Zealand Officials' Report: A Crime That Deserves a Revolution.
This
blogger, and some few others who resist a big brother statism that gathers pace
year on year, are lone voices in the wilderness anymore, and I know the score.
Most people reading this, including every hypocritical progressive who was out
on the street protesting the NSA and GCSB, will be celebrating this
crushing of those scapegoat firms the Googles and the Amazons, even as with
taxes fired into them, the cost of their goods and services will have to
skyrocket, adversely affecting the standard of living of all of us. Noting
that politicians won’t stop the rise and rise of the tax take, they can’t
afford to in the short term and will never find an excuse to in the long term,
until they destroy every public and private good created by free market
capitalism. And don’t console yourself with the thought that via this
declaration of a GATCA they’re only after the big boys or the fat cats: FATCA, which this
information sharing is based on, wasn't designed to kill corporates, it’s about
capturing the lives of individuals: it’s sharing information at the level of
individual citizens, no matter where they live in the world, and on every
financial asset they hold, including, therefore, transactions through them. If
you’re married to an American, living in New Zealand, every detail of every transaction
you transact through a joint account with your spouse, is likely being screened by IRD to be reported
to IRS, or straight handed over; that’s all your details, with your names on it, not just some mere
anonymous aggregate metadata which Progressives – surprisingly unsurprisingly invisible
in this debate - are so concerned about: what do you think about that? Because if I were to legislate for myself access to your every
financial transaction, I could describe your life down to its intimate details,
indeed down to what’s happening in the bedroom. And soon it's not just Americans caught, under GATCA we're all in the global surveillance net.
While
the economic disintegration of the West under its hubris of debt and welfare is
a given, the reason Big Brother McClay’s press release hurts this writer is
that in it resides the official sanction of New Zealand’s political party that
once stood for small government, that the right of citizens to be left alone if
doing no harm, and to be allowed lives private from the state, is long gone.
And with that must have gone hope. Given the frightening powers of our taxing authority, operating above the purview of our Privacy Act, a government whose bureaucrats
can routinely demand, search and analyse the financial transactions of any
individual, has the private lives of every citizen open to it, with this
information to be shared by massive bureaucracies around the world. ‘Automatic, autocratic information
sharing’. I ask Minister McClay to watch one movie during his coming
Christmas vacation - The Lives of Others:
the movie which showed how the East Berlin surveillance state dehumanised and
oppressed its population until it hurt so much they rebelled and struck down their
Berlin Wall to reclaim their private lives from tyrants.
I
will end by pointing out there is the odd redoubt of a freedom ethic making a valiant
stand against the darkness, but in the end – and this is the middle of the end
– they don’t have a chance. Companies whom – not ‘which’, companies are people
- have awoken to their plight in the US are using a process called inversion to get out of the US tax state
to lower tax jurisdictions, the latest attempt to escape being Pfizer. Also individuals incredibly are renouncing their US citizenship to avoid being
spied on by all world governments, their lives reported back to the IRS –
did you think you’d live to see the day Americans had to burn their passports
to be free? And, of course, there are the tax havens.
In
my last post I indicated how thanks to Panama we all get to enjoy the benefits
of cheap shipping of product to New Zealand which increases the standard
of living of all of us, and now I find amidst the predictable unseemly FATCA envy of Western politicians, such as Minister McClay, there is one tiny,
unsurprisingly prosperous principality, holding out: Panama – again, note the
highlighted sentence:
The South American
nation of Colombia does not have its own version of FATCA, but its government
wishes it did. That’s evident from its current tussle with neighbor Panama. The
root of the problem between the two nations is FATCA-style reporting of bank data,
or the lack thereof. Colombia wants it badly; Panama wants nothing to do with it.
Here’s a brief
background:
Panama City boasts a thriving financial
center, one of the largest in Latin America. Together with the Canal Zone it accounts for most of the country’s
GDP. One reason for the Panamanian banking sector’s success is ring-fencing.
This policy attracts capital flow from wealthy foreign investors all over the
world. Banks in Panama don’t collect information on accounts held by
nonresident depositors, so there is no information to share with tax collectors
in other countries.[FATCA alters that policy, but only for U.S.
accountholders.]
[Snip.]
Recently,
Colombian officials asked their Panamanian counterparts to sign a bilateral tax
information exchange agreement, known as a TIEA. The TIEA would have been
reciprocal in nature, meaning it would
oblige each signatory nation to collect and share bank information about the
other nation’s residents. Panama
said “no, thanks.”
A
bouquet goes to Panama.
If
a politician’s actions were governed by the best interests of those who voted
them in, the pursuit of prosperity and the continuation of the highest
standards of living any humans have achieved throughout history thanks to
capitalism, they wouldn’t be seeking to destroy tax havens, but to become one. They
would not be legislating taxes that were driving their most prosperous
companies beyond their borders, but ensuring through prudent spending a low tax
environment which compelled those companies to stay. But the corporations will
be destroyed, slowly, Panama’s days are numbered; you’ll note from the above
that just as Obama’s FATCA has – in a feat Hitler was never capable of - cracked
Swiss banking secrecy (read freedom), so FATCA has been too strong even for
this principled little principality; they're having to grass up their dual US
citizens also.
And
we’re all the losers. Not just cheap shipping, that money finding a tax-free
home in tax havens is working voluntarily in the capitalist system to seed
innovation, and to better the quality of all our lives around the world in a
way coercive Western welfare states are only destroying our economic lives, after
having first frog marched our private lives at gunpoint into the digital
garrisons of state officials.
Remember
this day when our Revenue Minister announced the year the Western Surveillance
State will become mandatory: 2019. And remember that in the meantime our
political masters are happy to share our private information, voluntarily – there’s the final
inversion for you, of language itself into doublespeak.
Update One:
Professor
of Economics, Donald J. Boudreaux, makes the point about GATCA that in 31 of
the 67 post-war years in the US when tax receipts increased, government
spending increased by more than $1 for every additional $1 of tax. So tax
evaders are not putting a further burden on non-evaders, indeed, lower taxes
raised perhaps force politicians to be prudent, meaning bringing the
Googles et al into the OECD tax net will in every way be growing Western state
surveillance tyrannies because they will consume all the extra monies, and
more, placing a bigger burden on future taxpayers, only to grow the power of
the state, and certainly the vice type grip of our autocratic, now global, taxing
and information sharing mechanisms. With so much information in the hands of
the IR’s, and them being so free to trade in it, there can be no space left for
a private life to inhabit. That’s not what our ANZACs were fighting for, and
that’s not what a free people should have accepted, let alone voted for.
Regarding
Boudreaux's point, note the actual problem: politicians.
adversely affecting the standard of living of all of us
ReplyDeleteno, it doesn't. It adversely affects the standard of living of those relatively few of us who pay nett tax - about 10% in NZ, fewer than that in the USA. If anything it positively affects the standards of living of the 90% who are living off our backs.
Oh wait a minute - perhaps you meant "us" to mean independent homo sapiens, not bludgers who certainly aren't really in any way part of "us - that'd be OK, bludgers are not fully human.
I mean our welfare states are out of control, creating dependency. Consequently our tax states are similarly out of control.
DeleteYou are an angry Tory :)