I’m going to take a big breath and say it: I liked TVNZ Channel
7. I understand from what I have read about the ratings, and despite what the
save campaign say, on some of their programming it may have only been me watching. But it was possibly some of the best programming, for me,
outside the Food Channel. Emily Perkin’s ‘The Good Word’ show about all things
bookish was one of my favourite spots of the week on our TV.
And let’s get this whole sordid confessional over.
During the day when I’m working I am normally streaming
Concert Program or BBC3 – currently listening to the Early Music Show as I pen
this. I listen to a lots of the arts related slots, especially books and
writing, on BBC4; I listen to a lot of Kim Hill’s interviews via podcast; and
in a nauseous orgy of state broadcasting I’ve started listening to National
Program’s Checkpoint at 5.00pm over Larry Williams on ZB, and I even – face
palming, ashamedly looking through the frost chapped cracks in my fingers -
have been known to listen to Jim Mora for an hour or two.
Woe is me. Woeful am I. Losing TVNZ 7 hurts.
But this said, I do not support state broadcasting. Why?
Read every other post on this blog, that’s why. Freedom is a package deal: I
can’t just pick those parts of the big state I like, and ignore the rest and
the fact the whole edifice is based on a theft enforced by the police state
powers of tax enforcement, and thus the truncating of liberty. And yes,
persecuting rich pricks, more than they already are, so I can watch The Good Word,
is immoral. So instead of philosophising on the last rites for TVNZ 7, I would
like to point to something that has been missed in the debate – that is, why is
commercial TV so awful? Because there’s a connection.
I suggest it’s because after so many decades of
Gramsci in our state school system, and the dumbing down that has occurred, there’s a
nihilism – as in gaggle - of unemployable youth being churned out, barely able
to
speak intelligibly anymore, and commercial TV, to survive, has to
generate its revenues off the scary menace their minds have become: thus, as this
generation would txt, our welfare mentality, reality TV has become ‘a bit
shit’. The crap that is commercial television, merely represents our age of
crap that has been begot of the welfare state, which has replaced the creative,
free individual, and his pursuit of happiness, with the collective ascendency
of a coke swilling, binge drinking moronacy of barfing idiots. And as I’ve
explained, already, I don’t believe
this is fixable anymore, as the
philosophical rot is seventy years deep.
The only question left from this is why not, then, grab onto
that which is good, as in uplifting for the secular soul, anymore, no matter it
may be served up on taxpayer money. Why not turn a blind eye to the persecution
of the rich pricks, who are most likely uncouth businessmen who wouldn’t know
Shakespeare from Shakespeare’s Sister anyway? Right?
Well I once posed the following question to Lindsay Perigo
on his SOLO site; what if lack of regulation, say, of fisheries, led to
fisheries being depleted, possibly wiped out? His answer was that men acting in
their self-interest would probably not do this, but it was possible, yes;
freedom has a price. And he’s right. For me, the price is no TVNZ 7; I have not
participated in any protest online or off. As much as I love that channel, I
would rather have my freedom, than be reading Shakespeare in a Gulag, even if I
say this from the depressing vantage point of knowing
I will never be a free man.
PS: Mr Dotcom, yes, I saw you on the funeral march: quite
apart from all the ironies involved, what Sky channel was TVNZ 7 on? …. Yeah, I
thought so.
Losing TVNZ 7 hurts.
ReplyDeleteNot as much as losing your welfare benefit because you smoked a joint last Friday, but, yeah, the principle's the same. As you rightly say, freedom is a package deal. Or, in the words of JFK, "Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free."
Anyway, Mark, my condolences. As for me, I'm just glad that the constant bombardment on Facebook to save TVNZ 7 will now let up.
7 down. 1, 2? Go!
I've had to abandon Facebook: I ended up with an unholy combination of family, friends and clients, and, really, never the twain shall meet between those groups. Haven't been back to my page in months :)
ReplyDeleteDotcom's a big boy who can look after himself. :-)
ReplyDeleteStop the extradition of Richard O’Dwyer to the USA
Well I once posed the following question to Lindsay Perigo on his SOLO site; what if lack of regulation, say, of fisheries, led to fisheries being depleted, possibly wiped out? His answer was that men acting in their self-interest would probably not do this, but it was possible, yes; freedom has a price.
ReplyDeleteLinz's answer was disingenous. He's heard of the tragedy of the commons. So have you, and you know exactly what would happen. Sans "regulation", the fisheries would be wiped out in short order.
But we don't need regulation. We need privatisation. And (I'm 100% sure you'll agree with me on this, at least) we need fish!
Unfortunately for you, ocean fish are not the products of men's minds. But they're scarce. Scarcity, not production, is the basis of property rights. I win this one. :-)
The issue of property rights aside, you've missed the point, which is that freedom has a price.
ReplyDeleteHi Mark, I never comment here as usually I simply agree with everything you've written. This time though... well, no this time. I still do. I merely have a question.
ReplyDeleteIf, as you posit and I often find myself thinking, that this situation is unfixable, then what are those of us who think of ourselves as classical liberals to do?
My own answer is to continue living as I would if we lived in a free world. Where restricted, I grumble and work around it. I find myself constantly angry, and ranting at my poor friends, who would rather I just shut up and enjoyed my life as my brothers keeper at the point of the government gun. This isn't a good way to be.
What works for you?
My two cents: Resist the erosion of our freedoms where;
Delete- It affects us personally
- Where we know what to do and how to do it
- Encourage others to do the same
Greig. Well, I'm doing your third paragraph, + a blog + a novel :)
ReplyDeleteWhat else can we do? One individual against the state (or IRD): you'll just get squashed, and if you have a family, it would be a pointless protest to the point of being irresponsible.
I do spend as much time as I can in wineries. And that's not just being facile.
I've come to it all we can do is get the ideas behind classical liberalism out as much as we are each individually able to. Because anybody coming out of the state school system will be hearing such ideas for the very first time: that's the real problem in our society today.
I agree. I'm continually told by all and sundry that my ideas are simplistic and could never work. They say it like a litany. That can only be the result of being taught not to think, and yet, these are all smart (and quite wonderful) people. It often gets me questioning whether I'm completely wrong. What stops me is that I've made the journey from left to right, and back again, and finally to here. They've never shifted their views a jot. It's that thought that keeps me confident that I'm on the right track.
ReplyDeleteI hear you on the wineries. I started a commercial brewing operation instead! ;)
Oh, that Greig. You're the only one with his head screwed on right :)
ReplyDeleteRemind me what brand of beer you brew(to buy)?
And those 'intelligent' people are wrong. If you can break through the 'litany' what they believe falls down quickly ... and that's when things usually start getting a bit fraught.
Oh you'll love the name of our brewing company:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.brewaucracy.co.nz
:) Bookmarked.
ReplyDeleteMmm. Bean counter ... how have I missed that on the shelves?
ReplyDeleteAh, we don't bottle sadly. Too small, and too much demand for kegs. We'll be fixing this eventually, but 400L doesn't go far. If you're in Auckland, Hamilton, Wellington, Rototrua, or Christchurch, there will be some Bean Counter on a tap near you within a month or so - in time for Beervana anyway. But this is turning into an ad! ;)
ReplyDeleteGreig - rest assured, you're on the right track. And "Brewaucracy - Beer with Authority" - that's classy and classic. :-)
ReplyDeleteMark - freedom isn't free, I agree. But the price tag is not kamado-grilled fish.
Greig: beer ads here fine by me.
ReplyDeleteRichard ... I'm going to have to look into your first post tonight when I get more time; I don't think I'm quite with it. The Kamado Komodo has been going crackingly, lately, though.
But I like fish!
ReplyDeleteI do not want them to die and I have no faith that fisherman will act in their own best interests.
Save the Flake! Regulate! (repeat)
Glad to see you've made it here Damien. As I said, the price of freedom might be no fish. We remain on opposite sides of the IRon Drape on this one.
ReplyDelete(... though there'll always be farmed fish. Trust me).
Yes, I have given this some thought.
ReplyDeleteIf the fish had an owner they would not be farmed to extinction. The solution is simple, they need an owner.
It does really matter who, but if there is an owner the market can work. If there is no owner you get the tragedy of the commons.
Getting the fish an owner may require some impure statist intervention, but all property, historically, has been acquired by with some impure statist intervention.
Once done you van have fish and freedom!
Happy to be here. I keep getting into trouble at the other place!
ReplyDeleteWell it can be a harsh place on muddlers.
ReplyDeleteCoincidentally with all this talk of fish, I'm teaching myself fly casting on the lawn for this coming season, so there better be some trout left.
Good luck. I find I lack the Zen to be a good fisherman.
ReplyDelete