I suspect this letter has zero chance of
seeing publication.
Anthony
Green of the Muslim Association of Canterbury says, quote, "the teachings
of Islam forbid the killing of civilians...', (17/11), which is great to know. However,
although I agree not every Muslim is a terrorist, (obviously), every terrorist
currently is a Muslim, so can the Press please give Mr Green the space of an
op-ed to explain why so many murderers of civilians justify their actions by
their Muslim beliefs. Including an explication of ISIS please. Because I want
to live in an open, peaceful, pluralistic society, but there is something
seriously wrong with Islam that so many are reading the Koran ‘then’ turning
themselves into murdering psychopaths, and I can't be bothered reading the
Koran or any other fantasy tract to understand this, nor is that demand on me,
because I think it’s fantastical BS. You may as well believe in the Hobbit. So
Mr Green: an explanation please, and give him the wordage Press.
Update 1:
The Press today published letters in support of Green's position - Islam is peace - not a single letter, including my own above, questioning why this religion of peace kills so many civilians. And that, right there, is the problem. Who'd a though; The Press sees itself as a safe place.
Update 1:
The Press today published letters in support of Green's position - Islam is peace - not a single letter, including my own above, questioning why this religion of peace kills so many civilians. And that, right there, is the problem. Who'd a though; The Press sees itself as a safe place.
Related Posts:
Hi Mark
ReplyDeleteI agree, but here is an excellent article from the UK Spectator's Douglas Murray that frankly says it all.
http://blogs.new.spectator.co.uk/2015/11/will-politicians-finally-admit-that-the-paris-attacks-had-something-to-do-with-islam/
"I can't be bothered reading the Koran or any other fantasy tract to understand this ..."
ReplyDeleteHerein lies your problem. You need to use their texts and the history of Islam to defeat their argument so need to understand it to debate the issues - not studying because you think its all bollocks isn't helpful. Quoting anti religious slogans from atheists or anti Christian rhetoric from progressives (who seem to see Islam as preferable to Christianity) isn't going to cut it because, in respect of Islam, these people are the appeasers. Of course it takes balls to challenge people that want to kill you simply because you disagree with them and maybe that is why you can listen to a several minute long interview about the Paris attacks and never hear the word Islam or Muslims mentioned. If you won't even name the enemy for fear of offending them who the heck are you fighting?
3:16
I don't need to read any of that shit. I'm not the one killing innocents.
DeleteNo your not killing innocents but Muslims are and don't give a shit because its theologically acceptable. Freezing works are full of bleating and mooing but the animals are still dead at the end of the day so noise and a strongly worded letter wont solve this.
ReplyDelete3:16
Ah, but you don't see my dastardly plan. Muslims are going to read this post, cast off their childish beliefs, and become rational, peaceful human beings.
DeleteHa, over your dead body. I hope its a metaphor of course - the wine industry needs people like you now that the wife has cut back.
ReplyDelete3:16