@MarkHubbard33 #euthanasia is not a heavy moral issue. We each manage our health issues thru-out our lives, death is simply the final issue.
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 15, 2014
New Zealand's Labour Leader, Andrew Little, today forced MP Iain Lees-Galloway to take
Maryan Street’s euthanasia bill back from the ballot: given Prime Minister John Key would rather talk to a blogger on the telephone than follow up on the promise he made last year for euthanasia legislation, there will now be no adult debate on euthanasia. Little's reason for his back-down is the usual inhumane, shocking
logic of statists:
"There are
more people affected by weak labour market regulation and weak economic
strategy than they are about the right to make explicit choices about how they
die."
The bill would have allowed any adult suffering from a condition likely to cause their death within 12 months to request medical assistance to die.
I
initially approached this in two ways with the unthinking, uncaring Leader of Labour - again, this is Twitter, I was very angry, still am, so please forgive the typos:
@AndrewLittleMP reasoning for dropping euthanasia bill the most spurious I can think off. More people worried about labour law than how 1/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP ... they are likely to die (in pain and indignity or not). How fucked up is that! a) is it not possible to do 2 things 2/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP ... at once. b) Compare 100 people under 'bad' labour law, & 1 person dying (DYING) is circumstances abhorrent 2 them. 3/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP ... According to u the 100 take precedence to that one dying life. I can't stand you identity pol collectivist monsters.
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@MarkHubbard33 Haven't read it all but is issue of priority. Can't do everything & need to choose. Putting labour law first will help 000s
— Andrew Little (@AndrewLittleMP) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP If you are dying in circumstances abhorrent to you, is anything more important than civilised euthanasia law?
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
Mr
Little’s cowardice today is no surprise, given the evil of his politick:
@AndrewLittleMP Your terrible ethic explained. You have held that the individual situation must be scrificed to the good of the many. 1/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP When an individual makes that sacrifice of themselves, that is truly noble if in a just cause (ie, I'm no Randoid). 2/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP H/e when the state makes that decision for the individual, that is totalitarian. Which is why in your every policy you 3/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP ... would force on a free people, the totalitarian state. You will never understand these posts. U have transacted 4/x
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP ... genuine cruelty, and lack of compassion today.
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
And
now note closely the nature of the brute who wants to run your life:
@MarkHubbard33 You're right about not understanding your posts. Looks like extreme libertarianism
— Andrew Little (@AndrewLittleMP) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP Total, cruel callous monster Andrew. For the record u don't believe I should have choice in euthanasia? #Disgusted
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP And quite apart from anything, that was such an imprudent, unthinking response from one who wants to run country.
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP The next person who chooses from desperation to die alone with a plastic bag over their head, coz it will happen, you go 1/2
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP ... explain to their family how it was because of some Twitter nutter's libertarianism.
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
And
then Little goes to the full anti-individualistic barbarity of the identity
politicker, like every tyrant throughout history.
Imagine if you were reading this and were dying of a terminal illness from which you
desperately wanted a dignified euthanasia option so you could leave the world
on your terms, in the embrace of your loved ones: because throughout this
exchange, in his need to save the masses in an unrelated matter of law, Little has not thought of that individual at all. Not once. Below is
why progressive collectivist societies under the tyranny of majority rule are vicious and cruel because they are built on
the forced-sacrifice of individual lives, which means they ultimately extinguish all lives:
@MarkHubbard33 Yes. But, as we say to our kids, it's not all about you. Serious public policy questions to deal with to prevent exploitation
— Andrew Little (@AndrewLittleMP) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP Goddamn you are a lightweight monster. Seriously, you're boiling down euthanasia debate to 'its not all about you'?
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
@AndrewLittleMP You're now completely misapplying Marxist feminist bullshit to euthanasia debate. At least get your memes sorted out.
— Mark Hubbard (@MarkHubbard33) December 14, 2014
As
of writing this post, to my knowledge - as no member of parliament will deign
to correspond with me over the issue of euthanasia - New Zealand’s Chief
Coroner is trying to change the death certification process so that even those
merciful releases unofficially occurring in our hospices and hospitals cannot happen
without prosecution, with a secondary consequence of more conservative pain
regimes likely to leave the dying in greater suffering. Please read my post on why it is urgent we have a civilised euthanasia law, and press our gutless,
cruel politicians on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment